HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 27360 of 2026 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Petitioner seeks electricity connection for running private tube well of 10 HP load under the scheme. Mr. Sunil Srivastava, learned advocate appears on her behalf and Mr. Shubhranshu Shekhar, learned advocate, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Anuj Tripathi, holding the brief appears for respondent nos 2 to 4 (the Supply Company). 2. Petitioner was given leave to add her co-sharers as respondent nos 5 and 6. They were noticed. Mr. Dhruva Dixit, learned advocate appears on their behalf. He files counter of date. 3. We have heard submissions at the Bar. Paragraph 9 from the writ petition is reproduced below. "9. That petitioner and other co-sharers of khasra no. 26 have filed an affidavit before the respondents that they have no objection if electricity connection granted for agriculture purpose. A true copy of an affidavits filed by petitioner and other co-sharers are being collectively filed herewith and marked as Annexure No.5 to this writ petition." Also paragraph 9 from the counter of added respondent nos 5 and 6 is reproduced below. "9. That the contents of paragraph 9 stated by Prem Vir Singh are totally false and have no merit. The respondents no. 5 and 6 are also co sharers Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Narendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Alok Mishra, C.S.C., Dhruva Dixit Smt. Birendri Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) in the said land and they have not given any affidavit regarding the issue of electricity connection. Moreover, the affidavits of other co sharers namely Mukesh Kumar son of Jugendra Singh, Omkar Singh son of Dariyal and Ramvati wife of Jugendra Singh had been forged and the said co sharers have given affidavits stating that they have not given any affidavit of such kind and the same had been forged without the consent of the said co sharers. The petitioner has given forged documents on the basis of which she tried to get electricity connection. A true photocopy of the affidavits sworn by the co sharers are filed and marked as C.A-2 to the counter affidavit." 4. We have dispute on facts. We will not be drawn into the controversy in exercise of writ jurisdiction. 5. The writ petition is dismissed leaving it open to petitioner to find her remedy. September 30, 2026 Anupam S/- WRIC No. 27360 of 2026 2 (Arindam Sinha,J.) (Prashant Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad