Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11076 (AP)

Tiruchanoor Gram Panchayt, Tiruchanoor Village & v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/44970/2016 · 2026-09-15

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010502932016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 16th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 44970 OF 2016 Between: 1. Tiruchanoor Gram Panchayt, Tiruchanoor Village &, Mandal, Chittoor District, State Of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Elected Sarpanch Keerakattu Ramachandra Reddy S/o. Yelumalai Reddy, aged 37 years, r/ o. Tiruchanur village & Mandal, Chittoor District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagaudi, Guntur District. 2. The Southern Power Distribution Company Of, A.P. Ltd., (SPDC of AP Ltd.,), Rep. by its Vice Chairman-cum- Managing Director,Tirupathh 3. The Sueprintending Engineer Operations, SPDC of AP Ltd. , Chittoor District at Chittoor. 4. The Accounts Officer SPDCL of AP Ltd, Chittoor District at Chittoor. 5. The Addil Assistant Engineer SPDCL of AP, Ltd., Operation, Damineedu village, Tiruchanoor Mandal, Chittoor District. ...Respondents 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the illegal action of the respondent Company in demanding exorbitant amounts in the name of arrears through the 5th respondent vide impugned demand letter in Lr. No. AE/OP/TNR/F.No. Panc/D.No. 508, dated 15.11.2016 by demanding pay exorbitant amount under the guise of arrears without there being any basis in most in whimsical and arbitrary manner as being illegal, arbitrary and consequently set aside the said demand letter of the 5th respondent and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner: K RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL Counsel for the Respondents: V R REDDY KOVVURI (SC FOR APSPDCL) Counsel for the Respondents: JAGARLAMUDI KOTESWARIDEVI (SC FORAPSPDCL) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 44970 OF 2016 The Court made the following order: Learned counsel for the Writ Petitioner submits that this matter has become infructuous and no further orders required in this Writ Petition. 2. Having so recorded said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Date: 16.09.2026 MNR 4 105 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION No.44970 OF 2016 Dt: 16.09.2026 Mnr