MOHAMMAD NISAR MANSOORI v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/9645/2026 · 2026-09-29
Rajiv Lochan Shukla
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11075 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11075 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9645 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
1. The Learned A.G.A. has raised preliminary objection stating that the applicant has been charged-sheeted for an offense under section 137 (2) of BNS, which is although a cognizable offense, but is a bailable offense. For a bailable offense, an anticipatory bail application is not maintainable.
2. On being confronted with this fact, Learned counsel for the applicant prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this application and move the appropriate Court for seeking regular bail.
3. This application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforementioned liberty. September 30, 2026 Sachin Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Upendra Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Mohammad Nisar Mansoori .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad