Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11073 (CHH)

SAMEER SHARMA (PETI. IN PERSON) v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1847/2025 · 2026-02-02

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:5939 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1847 of 2025 * - Sameer Sharma (Petitioner In Person) S/o Lt. Rampratap Sharma Aged About 73 Years Retired (S.B.I.), Resident Of B-57, Samadhiya Colony, Gwalier M.P. Past Resident- Village Marra, Tahsil Patan, Dist. Durg, Mo. No. 9977343478, 7999897035 ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Distt. Durg Chhattisgarh (C.G.) 2 - Divisional Commissioner Dist. Durg Chhattisgarh (C.G.) 3 - S.D.O (Revenue) Patan, Disst. Durg Chhattisgarh (C.G.) 4 - Tahsildar (Revenue) Patan Disst. Durg Chhattisgarh (C.G.) 5 - Naib Tahsildar Jamgaanv-R Patan, Disst. Durg Chhattisgarh (C.G.) 6 - Aman Shrivastava Patwari P.H. No. 32, Marra, Tehsil Patan, Disst. Durg C.G. 7 - Narendra Dhurae Patwari P.H. No. 32, Marra, Tehsil Patan, Disst. Durg C.G. 8 - Hare Krishna Tiwari Advocate, Station Road Distt. Durg, C.G. 9 - Asutosh Sharma S/o Late Shri Bhupendra Sharma R/o 406, M.I.G. Padmanavpur, Durg, C.G. 10 - Alka Sharma D/o Late Shri Bhupendra Sharma R/o 406, M.I.G. Padmanavpur, Distt. Durg, C.G. (Prior To Marriage Dubey) 11 - Abha Sharma D/o Late Shri Bhupendra Sharma R/o 406, M.I.G. Padmanavpur, Distt. Durg, C.G. 12 - Archna Sharma D/o Late Shri Bhupendra Sharma Present Address R/o 406, M.I.G. Padmanavpur, Distt. Durg, C.G. 13 - Usha Pathak W/o Vinod Pathak R/o 240, Mohan Nagar, Distt. Durg, C.G. 14 - Bina Diwan W/o Late Omkar Diwan R/o13-B. Matri Vihar, Near Radhika Mandir Supela, Bhilai, Distt. Durg, C.G. 15 - Ashish Mishra S/o Late Shri Dr. Arun Mishra R/o Marra, Tehsil Patan, Distt. Durg C.G. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.02.04 19:02:12 +0530 2 16 - Chandramukhi Tiwari W/o Prakash Tiwari R/o Rohnipuram, Dagniya, Behind Ges Goudan Distt. Raipur, C.G. 17 - Lilagar Dhimar S/o Late Radhe Dhimar R/o Marra Tehsil Patan, Distt. Durg, C.G. 18 - Omprakash Verma S/o Lt. Rameshwar Verma R/o Marra, Tehsil Patan, Dist. Durg, C.G. 19 - Bhojram Gond S/o Late Jeevaraksan Gond R/o Marra Th.- Patan, Distt. Durg C.G. 20 - Rambisal Marar S/o Lt. Itvari Marar R/o Marra Th- Patan, Distt. Durg, C.G. 21 - Ramnihal Marar S/o Lt. Itvari Marar R/o Marra Th- Patan, Distt. Durg, C.G. 22 - Kumar Varma S/o Lt. Jagdish Verma R/o Marra Th- Patan, Distt. Durg, C.G. 23 - Santosh Raout S/o Lt. Mehatar Raout R/o Marra, Th- Patan, Distt. Durg, C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioner in Person : Mr. Sameer Sharma For Respondents No. 1 to 5/ State For Respondent No. 8 For Respondents No. 13, 14 & 16 : : : Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Panel Lawyer Mr. Karunendra Narayan, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. B.P. Sharma, Advocate Ms. Swati Agrawal, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 03/02/2026 1. The petitioner in person has filed this petition seeking the following reliefs:- “10.1 Kindly be pleased to quash / set aside the impugned order dated 12/12/23, 17/09/21 and 29/06/20 (Annexure P-1, P-2, P-3) respectively, issued by the respondent revenue authority. 3 10.2 To kindly make any other order that may be deemed fit and just in the facts and the circumstances of the case including awarding cast throughout inclusive of the means profit throughout to the petitioner. 10.3 Kindly pass the order for fresh demarcation of the encroached agriculture land as aforesaid K.H. No. 846/1-A O.16 H, 847-0/44 H. 848-0.05 H, and 906-0.03 H inclusive of removal of encroachment over the aforesaid area by the process of CG LRC 250 process.” 2. The order dated 12.12.2023 passed by the Commissioner, Durg Division, Durg (C.G.) is revisable before the Board of Revenue according to the provisions of Section 50 of the CG Land Revenue Code, therefore, in my opinion, this petition is not maintainable. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail remedy available under the law. 3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as not maintainable. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti