Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11068 (MAD)

DR.VEL VELMOUROUGANE v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/6714/2026 · 2026-03-02

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 6714 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 6714 of 2026 Dr.Vel Velmourougane No. 250 Chemin De La Colline, 83210 Sollies pont, France, Rep. by his power agent V.Srinivasamoorthy, Kunichempet, Puducherry 605 501 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Collectorate, Puducherry 605 009 2. The Sub Collector (South) Villianur sub collector office, Puducherry. 3. The District Registrar, Puducherry Registration department, Kamaraj Salai, Sakthi Nagar, Saram, Puducherry 605 013. ..Respondent(s) Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for a direction to the respondents to remove the Zero value and consequently fix the guideline value for the petitioner’s property comprised in RS No. 56/ 1/A/1 situated at Kirumampakkam Revenue Village, Puducherry by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 05.02.2026 within a time frame fixed by this court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 6714 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Sasindran For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sridhar, AGP (Pondy) ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to remove ‘Zero’ value and consequently fix the guideline value for the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, based on the petitioner’s representation dated 05.02.2026, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that despite the land acquisition proceedings for the subject property having been quashed, and the said order having attained finality, till date, the ‘Zero’ value has not been removed by fixing a guideline value for the subject property. The petitioner had given a representation dated 05.02.2026 to the respondents for the said purpose. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3. Mr.R.Sridhar, learned AGP, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4. No prejudice will be caused to the respondents if the aforesaid representation of the petitioner is considered, on merits and in accordance with https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 6714 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the third respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner’s representation dated 05.02.2026 seeking for removal of the ‘Zero’ value and consequently fix the guideline value for the subject property, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No Costs. 02-03-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No RKM To 1. The District Collector Collectorate, New Revenue Complex, Vazhudavoor Road, Pettaiyanchatiram, Puducherry 605 009 2. The sub collector (South) Villianur sub collector office, Puducherry 3. The district registrar Puducherry Registration department, Kamaraj Salai, Sakthi Nagar, Saram Puducherry 605 013 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 6714 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. RKM WP No. 6714 of 2026 02-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis