Neutral Citation 2026:JHHC:3966 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 9390 of 2019 Rajendra Singh, S/o Tapanarayan Singh, R/o Jagarpur, P.O.- Basaura, P.S.- Lesliganj, Dist.- Palamau. --- --- Petitioner Versus Union of India through CBI --- --- Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mrs. Ritu Kumar, Adv. For the CBI : Mr. Deepak Kumar Bharti, Adv. --- 27/06.02.2026 Heard Mrs. Ritu Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Deepak Kumar Bharti, learned counsel appearing for the CBI. 2. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail as he is apprehending his arrest in connection with R.C. Case No. 4(A)/2013-R registered for the offences under Sections 120B read with 201/420/468/471 IPC and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. 3. The prosecution case reveals that the accused public servants along with a private person, i.e., Dhiraj Kumar (petitioner) of M/s Global Informatics had entered into a criminal conspiracy amongst themselves and in furtherance of the same, the public servants in strict abuse of their respective official positions dishonestly and fraudulently manipulated/allowed to manipulate the merit list assessment charts. It has further been alleged that during JET 2006, the merit list was manipulated by Dhiraj Kumar under the guidance and influence of JPSC officials in order to extend undue benefits to certain candidates who were dishonestly and fraudulently declared qualified even though they had secured less marks than the candidates who even after securing more marks, could not qualify. It has also been Neutral Citation 2026:JHHC:3966 2 alleged that marks in the assessment charts of a number of candidates obtained during interview were increased to extend undue favor to them which facilitated their selection as lecturers. 4. It has been submitted by Mrs. Ritu Kumar learned counsel for the petitioner that CBI has already submitted charge sheet against the petitioner and other accused persons and some of the accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 3349 of 2022 and its analogous cases. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner, pursuant to being successful in JET 2006, has been appointed as an Assistant Professor in the Department of History in the year 2008 and has an unblemished career. It has further been submitted that though the petitioner has not been named in the First Information Report, but subsequently in course of investigation, his name transpired though there is no iota of evidence which would suggest that the petitioner was a beneficiary to the manipulations committed by the JPSC officials. 5. Mr. Deepak Kumar Bharti, learned counsel appearing for the CBI has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and has submitted that a perusal of the chargesheet would reveal the manner in which the petitioner had benefited from the illegal transactions orchestrated by the other accused persons primarily comprising of the JPSC officials. 6. Admittedly, charge sheet has been submitted by the CBI and some of the co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in the A.B.A. No. 3349 of 2022 and its analogous cases. 7. On consideration of the evidence collected against the petitioner and the aforesaid facts, the petitioner is directed Neutral Citation 2026:JHHC:3966 3 to surrender before the learned trial court within a period of four weeks, and on his surrender, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, CBI, Ranchi in connection with R.C. Case No. 4(A)/2013-R, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 8. This application stands allowed. 9. Pending I.A.(s), if any, stands closed. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Dated- 6th February, 2026. Preet/- Uploaded on: 16 /02/2026.