Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11060 (GAU)

SALIM UDDIN LASKAR AND ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS

WP(C)/5499/2025 · 2026-07-19

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/5 GAHC010209292025 2026:GAU-AS:9938 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5499/2025 SALIM UDDIN LASKAR AND ORS S/O- LATE ACHAR ALI AND LATE KUTIBANU BIBI . R/O - VILLAGE- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR PT-I, DIST- CACHAR, P.O- MEHERPUR SO, P.S- SILCHAR, PIN- 788015 2: GULBAHAR BEGUM BARBHUIYA D/O- LATE ACHAR ALI AND LATE KUTIBANU BIBI. R/O- VILLAGE- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR PT-I DIST- CACHAR PO- MEHERPUR SO P.S-SILCHAR PIN- 788015 3: MONJU BEGUM MAZUMDER D/O- LATE ACHAR ALI AND LATE KUTIBANU BIBI. R/O- VILLAGE- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR PT-I DIST- CACHAR PO- MEHERPUR SO P.S-SILCHAR PIN- 788015 4: KARIM UDDIN LASKAR S/O- LATE ACHAR ALI AND LATE KUTIBANU BIBI. R/O- VILLAGE- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR PT-I DIST- CACHAR PO- MEHERPUR SO P.S-SILCHAR PIN- 788015 5: SAMSUL ALAM LASKAR S/O- LATE ABDUL RAHMAN LASKAR. R/O- VILLAGE- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR PT-I DIST- CACHAR P.O- MEHERPUR SO Page No.# 2/5 P.S-SILCHAR PIN- 788015. 6: RAFIUL ALAM LASKAR S/O- LATE ABDUL RAHMAN LASKAR.. R/O- VILLAGE- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR PT-I DIST- CACHAR PO- MEHERPUR SO P.S-SILCHAR PIN- 788015 7: FAIJUR RAHAMAN BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE IBRAHIM ALI BARBHUIYA AND LATE LECHU BIBI BARBHUIYA. S/O- ABDUL RAHMAN LASKAR. R/O - VILLAGE- BREN NAGAR DIST-CACHAR P.O- LANGLACHARA PT-I P.S.-JOYPUR PIN-788108 8: JALAL UDDIN KHAN S/O- LATE NENA MIYA KHAN AND LATE SAILY BIBI KHAN. R/O VILLAGE- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR PT-IV DIST- CACHAR P.O- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR B.O P.S- SILCHAR PIN-788006 9: MANIK UDDIN BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE ANFOR ALI AND LATE NURJAHAN BIBI. R/O- VILLAGE- BARIKNAGAR PT-II DIST-CACHAR PO- SAIDPUR B.O P.S-SILCHAR PIN- 788013 10: TAFAJUL ALI BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE ANFOR ALI AND LATE NURJAHAN BIBI. R/O- VILLAGE- BARIKNAGAR PT-II DIST.-CACHAR P.O- SAIDPUR B.O P.S-SILCHAR PIN-788013 11: KAMAR UDDIN BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE ANFOR ALI AND LATE NURJAHAN BIBI. R/O- VILLAGE- BARIKNAGAR PT-II Page No.# 3/5 DIST.-CACHAR P.O- SAIDPUR B.O P.S-SILCHAR PIN- 78801 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE TO THE DISASTER MANAGEMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, PIN- 781006 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CACHAR DACK BANGLOW ROAD NEAR COURT COMPOUND TARAPUR SILCHAR CACHAR ASSAM- 788001. 3:SETTLEMENT OFFICER CACHAR AND HAILAKANDI DISTRICTS TARAPUR SILCHAR CACHAR DISTRICT ASSAM PIN- 788001 4:ASSISTANT SETTLEMENT OFFICER SILCHAR SADAR CIRCLE SILCHAR CACHAR DISTRICT ASSAM PIN-78800 For the Petitioner(s) : Dr. G. J. Sarmah, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. Borpujari, SC, Revenue Mr. N. Das, Govt. Advocate BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 20.07.2026 Heard Dr. G. J. Sarmah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners. Mr. R. Borppujari, the learned counsel Page No.# 4/5 appears on behalf of the Revenue Department and Mr. N. Das, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the State Respondents. 2. 11 Petitioners claim rights over a plot of land covered by Dag Nos.565, 566, 567 and 568 pertaining to the 2nd R.S. Patta No.191 which have now been brought under Town Block No.1, Plot No.176 on the basis of inheritance being the legal heirs of one Sitara Banu Bibi who was the original owner of the said plot of land. 3. The grievance of the Petitioners is that although the Petitioners sought for mutating their names in the revenue records by filing applications before the Respondent No.4, however, the said process has not been proceeded with by the Respondent No.4 and on account of the delay and inaction on the part of the Respondent No.4, the Petitioners being aggrieved have approached this Court by filing the present writ petition. 4. This Court duly takes note of that the applications were filed in the year 2025, and as such, as per the provisions of the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886, the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 ought to have decided the application taking into account that at present, the 3rd Revenue Settlement proceedings are going on. 5. Considering the above, this Court therefore disposes of the Page No.# 5/5 instant writ petition. 6. This Court had not decided the inter-se rights of the Petitioners to have their names included in the mutation records, which aspect the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 shall duly decide thereby directing the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 to take effective steps for an early conclusion of the said mutation proceedings and preferably within a period of 4 months from the date a certified copy of the present order is served upon the Respondent No.3. JUDGE Comparing Assistant