Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11060 (AP)

N. Rajendra Prasad, v. Sri Suresh Kumar, I.A.S

CC/1793/2025 · 2026-09-17

V Sujatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010341122025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1793/2025 Between: 1. N. RAJENDRA PRASAD,, S/O N. BALAMUKUNDA PRASAD, AGED 63 YEARS, R/O H.NO.21-2-15/41,7TH ROAD, SKD COLONY, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SURESH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI M KRISHNA, THE COMMISSIONER, ADONI MUNICIPALITY, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. SRI VENKATA CHALAPATHI REDDY, THE MUNICIPAL ENGINEER, ADONI MUNICIPALITY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. SRI RANJIT BASHA I A S, . THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR (MUNICIPALITY) KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may 2 be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents U/s. 10 to 12 of contempts of Court Acts for willful and deliberate violation of Final order passed in WP No 718/2025 dated 06.02.2025 by Learned Single Judge and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOMMA VIJAYA RAJ KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI 2. SIVA SANKARA RAO BORRA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1793 of 2025 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 06.02.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.718 of 2025. The operative portion of the said order is extracted hereunder: “…..In view of the above instructions, since the bill amount claimed by the petitioner is an admitted bill, this Court feels it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to release an amount of Rs.11,36,808/-(Rupees Eleven lakhs thirty six thousand, eight hundred and eight only) to the petitioner within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order...” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders passed by this Court on 06.02.2025, are complied with. 3. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 18.09.2026 KA/JS 4 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1793 of 2025 Date: 18.09.2026 KA/JS