2026:MHC:1194 HCP No. 1981 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN HCP No. 1981 of 2025 S.Lurdu Mary ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The Additional Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai- 600009. 2.The Commissioner of Police Office of the Commissioner of Police, Tambaram City. 3.The Superintendent of Police Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai. 4.The Inspector of Police T16, Semmanchery Police Station, Chennai. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Habeas Corpus petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other appropriate Writ, calling for the records pertaining to the order of detention passed by the second respondent in his proceedings in No.87/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025, dated 07.08.2025 and quash the same as __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis HCP No. 1981 of 2025 illegal and produce the Detenue, Namely R.Sathish Kumar, S/o. Rajendran, aged 31 years, DRUG Offender now he is confined in Central Prison, Puzhal II, Chennai before this court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Raja For Respondent(s): Mr. R. Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor assisted By Mr. M. Sylvester John ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Sunder Mohan J.) The wife of the detenu-R.Sathish Kumar, branded as ‘Drug Offender’ under Section 2(e) of the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982, has filed this petition challenging the detention order dated 07.08.2025. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents. 3. We find on perusal of the record and on hearing the submissions on either side, the impugned order cannot be sustained on the sole ground __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis HCP No. 1981 of 2025 that the special report sent by the sponsoring authority is undated. The compelling necessity to detain the detenu would depend on the date on which the sponsoring authority has sent his report. In the absence of the said date, the special report would become irrelevant and the compelling necessity to detain the detenu becomes doubtful. 4. Further in 'Rekha Vs. State of Tamil Nadu through Secretary to Government and another' reported in '2011 [5] SCC 244', the Hon’ble Supreme Court had held that where the detention order is passed on any irrelevant material, then, the detention order is liable to be quashed. Therefore, we are of the view that for the aforesaid reasons the impugned detention order is liable to be set aside. 5.Accordingly, this Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the Detention Order passed by the second respondent in Detention Order No.87/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025, dated 07.08.2025 is set aside. 6.The detenu, viz., R.Sathish Kumar, S/o. Rajendran, aged 31 years, who is now confined in Central Prison, Coimbatore, is directed __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis HCP No. 1981 of 2025 to be set at liberty forthwith, unless his presence is required in connection with any other case. (A.S.M.,J.) (S.M.,J.) 24-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ars To 1. The Additional Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Fort.St.George, Chennai- 600009. 2. The Commissioner of Police Office of the Commissioner of Police, Tambaram City. 3. The Superintendent of Police Central Prison, Coimbatore. 4. The Inspector of Police T16, Semmanchery Police Station, Chennai. 5. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis HCP No. 1981 of 2025 DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. AND SUNDER MOHAN, J. ars HCP No. 1981 of 2025 24-03-2026 __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis