Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body
2026 DAILYLAW 11056 (PNJ)
ANKUSH KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB
CRM-M/6990/2026 · 2026-04-23
Vinod S Bhardwaj
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11056 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11056 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-6990-2026
!" ! # ANKUSH KUMAR AND ANOTHER
STATE OF PUNJAB
$ %&$ '( ' )
*****
! Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Senior DAG, Punjab.
""""" ( ' )+ , -./
# $! !% & %!& '!(' ( )!'! &('*'! &' %!'' ' +,- !.! /0) '!! - ! ) )'&% & % )120 ,3++3) ' 45###345##,-3#45##4-5#6#45 .0- 4 -, ##,45 3345 ! .0 - & 5 & 7. 7 0) !& )' ) ! &)! & 8 '& ) %!& ! ! % & VISHAL SHARMA 2026.04.24 12:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
$0$0#11!0! # %!& 0203-0425627-$! )&/ 73-! )
3. In relation to petitioner-accused Sushil Kumar, he contends that the case of the petitioner would be at par with co-accused Jaskirat Singh to whom concession of regular bail has been granted vide order dated 20.01.2026 passed in CRM-M-56175-2025. He contends that similar allegation of the petitioner being armed with gandasi had been attributed to the said co-accused. He further submits that the petitioner has clean antecedents and no recovery has been effected from him. + 9 8 '& )' ! ! ! ! ': )! !
)'&% &!&/%) 3 2 ! ! & '& ) %!& ! !) ! ')!! '& ) ! ! 6 ; ! ' ) ! ! < )! & / ! ': )!2 &) ! 3-0'25. 627- 8 '25. '2- )'&% & ! ! &8 ' = $! &/&& ! '25. 627- 8 '25. '2- % & )'& % & ! ' ! ) >' % & % ?'/ % ! ! & 8 '?7'/) , 2 & ! ! '25. 627- 8 '25. '2-!&& </! !&& &'/ ' / &/ &/ VISHAL SHARMA 2026.04.24 12:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
$0$0#11!0! # - $! % ! % !&& % ' < ! !!$ &8 '!&& !
!% &%& & ,( ' )/
&+! #
;!! )?
@?0 ;!! %& @?0 VISHAL SHARMA 2026.04.24 12:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document