VIKASH KUMAR GUPTA @ VIKASH KUMAR @ SONU v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3834/2026 · 2026-05-06
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11056 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11056 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:13423 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 3834 of 2026 Vikash Kumar Gupta @ Vikash Kumar @ Sonu, aged about 29 years, S/o Late Mahesh Gupta @ Mahesh Sao, R/o-Village-Shahpur, P.O. – Shahpur, P.O. – Shahpur, P.S. Chainpur, District- Palamu, Jharkhand.
… … … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… … ... Opp. Party
---------
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
--------- For the Petitioner: :Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate For the State
:Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Addl.P.P.
--------- 02 /Dated: 06.05.2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 130 of 2026 arising out of Chainpur P.S. Case No. 249 of 2024 (G.R. No. 52 of 2026) instituted for the offences punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that Rohit Kumar Ravi died by slipping from the staircase while he was going inside the room and only because the wife of the petitioner objected to visit of Rohit Kumar Ravi to the room of their tenant namely Babita, hence, suspicion has been raised that the petitioner might have committed death of Rohit Kumar Ravi; even though as per the version of the occurrence of the eye witnesses are to the contrary. It is submitted that charge sheet has been submitted as mentioned in paragraph 24 of bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph 22 of the bail application. It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witnesses of the case in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail.
Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessiosn Judge-IX, Palamau at Daltonganj in connection with S.T. Case No. 130 of 2026 arising out of Chainpur P.S. Case No. 249 of 2024 (G.R. No. 52 of 2026) with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case and he undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witnesses of the case in any manner during the pendency of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated: 06.05.2026 Uploaded: 07.05.2026
MM/Cp.03