Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11054 (GAU)

SHRI JITEN SARMA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS

W.P.(Crl.)/27/2026 · 2026-07-23

Pranjal Das, Sanjay Kumar Medhi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010127042026 2026:GAU-AS:10192-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : W.P.(Crl.)/27/2026 SHRI JITEN SARMA SON OF- LATE SATYA NATH SARMA, R/O- CHANDAN NAGAR, NAGARIK PATH, BELTOLA POLICE STATION, DISPUR, DISTRICT- KAMRUP METRO, GUWAHATI -781028 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPERSENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT -I- BLOCK 2ND AND 3RD FLOORS, JANATA BHAWAN, DISPUR, GUWAHATI -781006 2:THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOME MANTRALAYA MADAM CAMA ROAD HUTATMA RAJGURU CHOWK NARIMAN POINT MUMBAI MAHARASHTRA- 400032. 3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM POLICE ASSAM POLICE HEADQUARTERS (HQ) ULUBARI GUWAHATI -781007 4:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE MAHARASHTRA POLICE HEADQUARTERS AT SHAHID BHAGAT SINGH MARG COLABA Page No.# 2/4 MUMBAI MAHARASHTRA- 400001. 5:THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE GUWAHATI CITY POLICE COMMISSIONERATE KHANAPARA GUWAHATI- 781022 6:THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE THE COMMISSIONERATE OF POLICE AT THANE MAHARASHTRA SITUATED AT NEAR KALAWA BRIDGE KHARKHAR ALLEY THANE WEST MAHARASHTRA- 400601 7:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ASSAM POLICE DISTRICT- EAST SURVEY DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 8:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE HATIGAON POLICE STATION HATIGAON GUWAHATI- 781038 9:THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER DAHISAR POLICE STATION KRISHNA COLONY DAHISAR EAST MUMBAI MAHARASHTRA -400068 10:THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER VASAI POLICE STATION THANE MAHARASHTRA- 401201 11:KINJEL OLD AGE HOME SITUATED AT SAHARA NIWAS DIWAN BADI PABDI BANGALI MARG NEAR GANESH MEDICAL SHOP VASAI DISTRICT -PALGHAR MAHARASHTRA -401201 12:SHRI PUTUL DAS Page No.# 3/4 THE CARRE TAKER OF KINJEL OLD AGE HOME SITUATED AT SAHARA NIWAS DIWAN BADI PABDI BANGALI MARG NEAR GANESH MEDICAL SHOP VASAI DISTRICT- PALGHAR MAHARASHTRA - 401404. 13:DR. GHANASHYAM NATH SON OF- NIDHIRAM NATH AKASHBANI ALAKA NABAGIRI PATH CHANDMARI GUWAHATI -78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : SADHAN KALITA, MS. N HUSSAIN,P. DAS,MRITYUNJOY KALITA,GUNJAN DAS Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MS. D NEWAR(R13),MR. S CHAKRABORTY(R13) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 24-07-2026 (S.K.Medhi,J) Heard Shri P. Das, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri D. Nath, the learned State counsel for the State respondent and Shri S. Chakraborty, the learned counsel for the respondent No. 13. 2. The present petition was instituted by the petitioner on behalf of one Pranab Roy Chowdhury, a senior citizen who was projected to be under illegal confinement at Kinjel Old Age Home, Vasai, Thane in the State of Maharashtra. The nature of the writ prayed for is Habeas Corpus. The petitioner has stated that he is a neighbour of the original house of the said Shri Pranab Roy Page No.# 4/4 Chowdhury. This Court had accordingly issued notice on 22.06.2026. 3. It however transpires that the person concerned, Shri Pranab Roy Chowdhury had passed away. In this connection, a report dated 20.07.2026 had been issued by the Police Inspector (Crime), Dahisar Police Station, to the Registry stating that Shri Pranab Roy Chowdhury had passed away on 06.07.2026, which is after institution of the present writ petition. 4. Shri Das, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the basis of instituting this petition was a video transmitted by the deceased to the petitioner from where it could be understood that the deceased was in distress. He accordingly submits that there appears to be some foul play as the deceased was an unmarried person. 5. Be that as it may, considering the nature of the writ petition filed, this Court is of the opinion that there will be no scope of any further adjudication, as the person concerned has passed away. 6. The writ petition accordingly stands closed. 7. The petitioner or any other appropriate person would be at liberty to raise any issue towards the death of Shri Pranab Roy Chowdhury, including any claim for compensation or damage in the appropriate court, in accordance with law. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant