Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11048 (RAJ)

HARPHOOL CHAND SAINI SON OF SHRI GHASI RAM SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/13605/2026 · 2026-07-29

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:29443] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13605/2026 CNR: RJHC020707972026 | URN: CW / 29642U / 2026 Harphool Chand Saini Son Of Shri Ghasi Ram Saini, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Village Nayan, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Energy Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Managing Director, Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Jaipur, Raj. 3. Chief Personnel Officer, Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited, Room Number 204, Vidyut Bhawan, Jaipur, Raj. 4. Assistant Engineer, 132 Kv Gss, Markhi, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ayush Bansal, for Mr. Ashok Bansal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Lodha, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 29/07/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a low paid employee and he has been transferred from Markhi to Barmer, which is at a very distant place and due to such transfer the petitioner, who is a low paid employee, would face serious hardship in maintaining his family, and in such circumstances, the work performance of the petitioner would also be adversely affected. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the transfer of the petitioner in no manner can be said to be illegal [2026:RJ-JP:29443] (2 of 2) [CW-13605/2026] and arbitrary as the services of large number of technical workmen are required in the western Rajasthan, however, in case the petitioner submits a representation, they would consider the same for posting of the petitioner at a nearby place to his hometown. 3. In view of the submissions of both the parties, the Court deems just and proper to allow the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent authorities for consideration of his case for posting/transfer at a nearby place to his hometown. 4. The petitioner would submit a representation within a period of seven days from today. In case the respondent receives any representation from the petitioner within the given time of seven days, they shall consider the same in objective manner looking to the hardship of the petitioner, who is a low paid employee and they shall pass appropriate order as early as possible. 5. Till disposal of the representation if submitted by the petitioner, the effect and operation of the impugned transfer order dated 10.07.2026 qua the petitioner shall remain stayed and he shall be allowed to continue at Markhi. 6. In case the petitioner fails to submit the representation within the given time of seven days, this interim order will automatically seize its effect. 7. Writ petition stands disposed. 8. Stay application as well as pending application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/37