Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11045 (JHR)

TEJLAL YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1908/2026 · 2026-04-29

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:12568 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1908 of 2026 ------ Tejlal Yadav, son of Raghu Gope, resident of Village Kumhar Gadiya, P.O. Bajto, P.S. Giridih (M), Giridih .... .... …. Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner : Mr. Tarun Kumar No.1, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pathak, A.P.P. ------ 02/29.04.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Giridih (M) P.S. Case No. 339 of 2023 corresponding to G.R. No.1616 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Giridih. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that prior to the instant case, mother of the petitioner has instituted the case against the husband/informant, Pradip Yadav and others in which mother of this petitioner has received injury. He next submits that there are case and counter case between the parties and the altercation took place as water was thrown on the body of the husband of the informant while going on motorcycle. He further submits that informant side have been granted anticipatory bail by the learned Sessions Judge in A.B.P. No.1012 of 2025 except Pradip Yadav in the case which was filed by the petitioner side. He also submits that occurrence is of 23.10.2023, whereas the FIR has been lodged on 27.10.2023. He next submits that the petitioner has taken her mother for treatment on 23.10.2023 and he was not present on the spot. He also submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 10 of the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of assault and injury have also been received. 5. Considering that occurrence is of 23.10.2023 and the FIR has been lodged on 27.10.2023 and earlier the case has been filed by the petitioner side in which mother of this petitioner has received injury and the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 10 of 2026:JHHC:12568 the petition and in that view of the matter, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Giridih, Giridih (M) P.S. Case No. 339 of 2023 corresponding to G.R. No.1616 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 04.05.2026