Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11043 (JHR)

MAHBOOB ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3730/2026 · 2026-05-04

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:13155] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3730 of 2026 ------ Mahboob Ansari, aged about 40 years, son of Jakir Husain @ Jakir Miyan, resident of Village Fatehpur, P.O. and P.S. Fatehpur, District- Jamtara, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 04-05-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Madhupur P.S. Case No.47 of 2021 registered for the offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner files the supplementary affidavit. Keep the same in the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with accused persons committed dacoity and looted the mobile phone, laptop and Rs.5,00,000/- and while going away they injured the staff of the informant namely Raj Kumar Verma by assaulting him with the butt of the pistol and firing in the air. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the petitioner has not been put to T.I.P. nor he has been identified by anyone even though, the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. It is next submitted that the co-accused person, with similar allegation has been admitted to bail by the co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 07.07.2022 in B.A. No.4837 of 2022. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.12.2025 as mentioned in para-13 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhupur in connection with Madhupur P.S. Case No.47 of 2021 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 04/05/2026 Amar/