Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:29194] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6743/2026 CNR: RJHC020310722026 | URN: CW / 14808U / 2026 M/s Rahul Enterprises, Khawasano ka Mohalla, Phagi, District Jaipur through its Proprietor Rahul S/o Satyaprakash, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Ward No.08, Mohalla Frashkhana, Narnaul District Mahendragarh (Haryana). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, through Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Axis Bank, Branch Office at P.no.1, Banipark Scheme-E, Jobner Bagh, Pareek College Road, Station Road, Jaipur Through Branch Manager.
3. Dy. Inspector General, Cyber Crime, Rajasthan, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devanshu Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sunita Meena, AGC Ms. Devakriti Vashistha, AAAG for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG Mr. Bhaskar Sharma, for respondent No.2 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 28/07/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition with a prayer to direct the respondent-Bank to defreeze the account, maintained by the petitioner with Axis Bank.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that account of the petitioner has been freezed on the basis of information provided by the Investigating Authority. However,
[2026:RJ-JP:29194] (2 of 2) [CW-6743/2026] there is no complaint against the petitioner on National Cybercrime Reporting Portal.
3. The said statement made by learned counsel for the respondent-Bank is supported by the respondent-Department.
4. There is nothing on record to show that any complaint has been received by the Investigating Authority, nor copy of any FIR or cyber crime complaint is on record. Under these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for granting liberty to approach the Competent Authority in view of Clause 10 of Grievance Redressal Mechanism of Section-III of the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) dated 02.01.2026 issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs.
5. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the present writ petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to avail his remedy under the aforesaid SOP and the Authorities are
directed to dispose of the grievance of the petitioner within the time frame given in the SOP.
6. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case.
8. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J 32 - RAVI KHANDELWAL