Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11036 (PNJ)

RAVINDER SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/63891/2023 · 2026-04-08

Mandeep Pannu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

108 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.13139 of 2026 in/and CRM-M No.63891 of 2023 Date of decision: 08.04.2026 RAVINDER SINGH …Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present :- Mr. Navmohit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mr. Sushil Kumar Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J.(Oral) CRM No.13139 of 2026 This is an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C/528 BNSS seeking restoration of main case, which had been dismissed for non- prosecution by this Court vide the order dated 11.03.2026. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the main petition is ordered to be restored to its original number. CRM-M No.63891 of 2023 1. Heard on the petition. 2. The only prayer made by the petitioner in the present petition is to expedite the trial which is pending since 2019. The case is still pending for the prosecution evidence. NEETU RANI 2026.04.08 18:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD CRM-M No.63891 of 2023 -2- 3. Keeping in view the pendency of the trial since 2019 and also keeping in view the fact that out of 20 prosecution witnesses, only 06 witnesses have been examined, direction is issued to the trial Court to expedite the trial. 4. The present petition is disposed of accordingly. 5. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) 08.04.2026 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No NEETU RANI 2026.04.08 18:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD