HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 19711 of 2026 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party. 2. The present second bail application has been filed by the applicant under Section 483 BNSS to enlarge him on bail in Crime No. 423 of 2025, under Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Farah, District- Mathura. The first bail application was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 21.04.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 2314 of 2026. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the applicant has a criminal history of 26 cases, in which he has been enlarged on bail. The applicant is in jail since 24.11.2025. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail and contends that the applicant has been framed under the Gangsters Act and has a tendency to perpetrate crime in future. Learned A.G.A. further submits that the applicant has been named in the F.I.R. dated 12.11.2025 along with three other co-accused. The applicant has been allegedly found in different kind of crimes, entailing him not to extend any benefit of enlarging on bail. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the material on record, it is evident that he along with three other co-accused Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Azhar Hussain, Mohd. Razif Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Gopal Goswami .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) have been named in the FIR and his involvement in crime related to the Gangsters Act. Thus having regard to the evidence available on record against the applicant and his complicity in the crime, moreover, there is no change in the circumstances or the law, as such the grounds raised in the earlier application have been repeated by and large, hence taking into consideration, the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and considering the statement of the victim and witnesses, I do not find any good ground to release the applicant on bail. Thus the bail application moved on behalf of the applicant- Gopal Goswami is hereby rejected. 6. Observations made herein-above by this court are only for the purpose of disposal of this bail application and shall not be construed as an expression of this court on the merits of the case. September 25, 2026 Prashant D. BAIL No. 19711 of 2026 2 (Harvir Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRASHANT DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad