Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11031 (CHH)

SUNITA NAGESH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1179/2019 · 2026-01-18

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:3035 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 1179 of 2019 1 - Sunita Nagesh D/o Jiyalal Aged About 28 Years W/o Chhedi Lal Nagesh Caste Bhaina (S. T.) R/o Village Salhekota, Tehsil Marwahi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - District Program Officer Department Of Women And Child Development Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Project Officer Department Of Women And Child Development Marwahi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Marwahi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Collector Bilaspur District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Commissioner Bilaspur District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh HARNEET KAUR Digitally signed by HARNEET KAUR Date: 2026.01.20 11:07:41 +0530 2 7 - Gomti Bhanu D/o Nohar Singh Aged About 21 Years Caste Bhaina (S. T.) R/o Village Salhekota Tehsil Marwahi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) For Petitioner :- None For Respondents 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6/State :- Mr. Sahil Singh, P.L. For Respondent No. 4 :- Ms. Rakshita Mishra on behalf of Mr. Chandresh Shrivsatava, Advocates SB - Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Judgment on Board 19.01.2026 1. The matter was called up twice for hearing but none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to prosecute this petition. In these circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 2. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Harneet