APHC010229032024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 542/2025 Between: 1. PANDITI MADHUSUDHANA RAJU, S/O SUBBA RAMA RAJU, HINDI, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, DRIVER OF THE OMNI BUS BEARING NO. AP18 P 2444, RESIDING AT CHENNARAJUPADU VILLAGE, OBULAVARIPALLI MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. NEELAM MALYADRI, , S/O KONDAIAH, COOLIE, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. AUTO OWNER-CUM-DRIVER , RESIDING AT SUNKI REDDYPALEM VILLAGE, PONNALUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA COMMISSIONER OFFICE, POLICE OFFICE, WARD NO.22, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High Courtpleased to allow the present appeal throughout costs by setting aside the impugned Decree and award passed by the Ld. Trial Court The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum-1 Additional District Judge, Nellore in MVOP No.218/2018 , dated 28.12.2023 and to pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the present case IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 condone the delay of 309 days in re-presenting the MACMA.Sr.No. 18323 of 2024 before this Hon’ble court and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Suspend the order Dated 28-12-2024 in MVOP No.218/2018 on the file of Hon'ble Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum I Additional District Judge, Nellore and to pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. JITENDRA KANYALUR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA M.A.C.M.A.No.542 of 2025 ORDER: Learned counsel for the appellant addressed a letter dated 18.09.2026 to the Registrar (Judicial) to list the matter under the caption ‘for withdrawal’. Accordingly, the matter is listed today under the caption ‘for withdrawal’. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal and accordingly, permission is accorded. 3. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 22.09.2026 KA/JS 4 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA M.A.C.M.A.No.542 of 2025 Date: 22.09.2026 KA/JS