IN TH 113 Rahul Dha Chinmai G (HSSC), H CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o ordinate B Dhanda vs. “… to rec or graduat It is made of appointm against the 378-2026 t Dhanda an 09.2.2026 COCP-5308-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.5308 o Date of decision ul Dhanda Versus mai Garg, Secretary, Haryana Sta C), Haryana, Panchkula (Haryana) AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI None for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 05.8.2025 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CWP-15 da vs. State of Haryana”, whereby the reconsider the case of the petitioner duation. Let the needful be done wit ade clear that date of joining of the ointment for all intents and purposes Learned counsel for the resp st the Writ Court order dated 05.8.202 2026 titled as “Haryana Staff Selecti da and another” has been preferred, .2026 notice of motion has been 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 5308 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-19.02.2026 …..Petitioner na Staff Selection Commission yana) …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA dl. A.G., Haryana. ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- 15728-2022 titled as “Rahul by the respondents were directed oner after awarding four marks e within two months from today. f the petitioner shall be his date oses…..” e respondent-State submits that .8.2025 (Annexure P-1) an LPA- Selection Commission vs. Rahul erred, in which, vide order dated been issued on 09.2.2026 for VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.19 15.50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 19.2.2026. alongwith Commissio dated 14.1 impugned j aforesaid o date of h representat State, the p February Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-5308-2025 (O & M) .2026. The said LPA has further b with LPA-33-2026 titled as “H mission vs. Gagandeep Singh and oth 14.1.2026, while issuing notice of gned judgment dated 11.7.2025 has be Learned counsel for the State said orders passed in both LPAs, whic None had appeared on behal of hearing i.e.30.10.2025 and e sentation on behalf of petitioner. In view of the statement made , the present contempt petition is dispo Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, uary 19, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 rther been directed to be heard as “Haryana Staff Selection nd others”, in which, vide order ice of motion, operation of the has been stayed. State handed over copies of the , which are taken on record. behalf of petitioner on the last and even today there is no t made by learned counsel for the disposed of. if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.19 15.50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document