MAYA SINGH ETC. v. AMBALA KURUKSHETRA GRAMIN BANK ETC.
CWP/4154/2001 · 2026-04-10
Harpreet Singh Brar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1103 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1103 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
102 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 10.04.2026
1. CWP-4154-2001 (O&M) Maya Singh and others ... Petitioners Vs. Ambala Kurukshetra Gramin Bank and others ... Respondents
2. CWP-15471-1999 (O&M) Mohan Singh and others ... Petitioners Vs. Ambala Kurukshetra Gramin Bank and others ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Amit Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners (in CWP-4154-2001). Mr. R.K. Malik, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Dhull, Advocate for the petitioners (in CWP-15471-1999). VISHNU 2026.04.10 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
CWP-4154-2001 -2- CWP-15471-1999 Mr. Bikramjit Singh Patwalia, Advocate for respondent No.1 (in CWP-4154-2001). Mr. Suresh Ahlawat, Advocate for Mr. J.S. Maanipur, Advocate for respondents No.2, 3, 7, 8, 10 & 11 (in CWP-4154-2001). ******* HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL)
1. CWP-4154-2001 has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari seeking quashing of criteria laid down by respondent No.1 for promotion from MMGS- I to MMGS-II and also the order dated 02.12.1999 (Annexure P-4), vide which respondents No.2 to 11 were promoted. It is further prayed to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.1 to consider the cases for promotion of all eligible persons as per old promotion policy of 1988.
2. CWP-15471-1999 has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the seniority list dated 04.10.1999, vide which the private respondents were declared senior to the petitioners and further to direct the respondents to grant all the consequential benefits.
3.
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that in view of the
judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Government of West Bengal and others Vs. Dr. Amal Satpathi and others, 2024 SCC Online SC 3512, the issue of promotion post-retirement cannot be considered and submit VISHNU 2026.04.10 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
CWP-4154-2001 -3- CWP-15471-1999 that both these petitions may be disposed of having been rendered as infructuous.
4. Ordered accordingly.
5. The pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand
disposed of.
6. Photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case.
[ HARPREET SINGH BRAR ] 10.04.2026
JUDGE vishnu Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VISHNU 2026.04.10 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh