Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11021 (PNJ)

LOVEPREET SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/14912/2026 · 2026-03-18

Subhas Mehla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

   -1-    IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH  CRM-M-14912-2026 Decided on: 18.03.2026     …...Petitioner Versus    ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Rajinder Goel                                  !  " #   $   **** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral) %  &         !   $  #     '()  * )+),  -         ! $    !   ./0 '1' +%%))+)1#   ,%23)4,%(3'42%3)4,,23,4 ,,( ,'+3)4  ,+,3)4  *      3*4 )+),      $    &     $  )  * $            !         $      3    4      5     $  $$        #$    !   !6#  $0 #3      7  4  #   37  4 $   #   +8%%)+)1 &  $$  $           $- -   $  !   #   -   $ !   #  SONIA PURI 2026.04.15 12:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document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attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document    -3-          $    $$                       $   '      1  /##           #              ! $    6          ! $      $  #!    6#  0  3 $      4   # 0)'+++:6 #    0'%,1++:6 #  $ $- $$ 0,82+++:6##-          $ : <   #   $-!  $              $   $        <  #          $ $   $$    Learned counsel further contended that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required in the present matter to collect the evidence and for recovery purposes. Hence, prayed for dismissal of the present petition seeking anticipatory bail. 6. Mr. Abhijeet Chaudhary, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant by way of filing of Power of Attorney and submits that the petitioner is directly involved in the commission of the alleged offence, as certain transactions have been made from the account of the present petitioner.  8   SONIA PURI 2026.04.15 12:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document    -4-    (          >  #              $     $   # $      $$             #  #       $ $  #    $  $-< "#           $  # $        #      #   $  $- #   $-  $     :          #     $        <           #    6#   $0   #    $              $$            #   $$                  #   # < #  $        9#   #   #           $$     #  /                 =!$  #   "#    ?       #  $    ! $     # #$     $    $    !   $        #       #      #     $$6  !    ! $        !  #     #$ @          $                     $       $          ! !  SONIA PURI 2026.04.15 12:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document    -5-    10. Nothing observed herein shall be construed as  A     ! "# $    #     $ (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 18.03.2026 Sonia Puri Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO  Whether Reportable: YES/NO  SONIA PURI 2026.04.15 12:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document