Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1102 (PNJ)

MAHENDRA PRATAP SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

CWP/11094/2026 · 2026-04-10

Deepak Manchanda, Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

119 MAHENDRA PRATAP SINGH UNION OF INDIA CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. certain discrepancies have crept in while drafting of the present petition hence, the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action with better particulars. 2. 10-04-2026 Sapna Goyal NOTE: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11094 Date of Decision : MAHENDRA PRATAP SINGH VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Mr. Arun Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate for the respondent-Union of India. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently certain discrepancies have crept in while drafting of the present petition hence, the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of as having been ressed any further with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action with better particulars. Ordered accordingly. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) 2026 (DEEPAK MANCHANDA NOTE: Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable: NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 094-2026 Date of Decision : 10.04.2026 ........Petitioner VERSUS ........Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI DEEPAK MANCHANDA Vikas Sharma, Advocate Union of India. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently certain discrepancies have crept in while drafting of the present petition hence, the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of as having been ressed any further with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE reasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently certain discrepancies have crept in while drafting of the present petition hence, the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of as having been ressed any further with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of SAPNA GOYAL 2026.04.18 11:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document