MAHENDRA PRATAP SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
CWP/11094/2026 · 2026-04-10
Deepak Manchanda, Harsimran Singh Sethi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1102 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1102 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
119
MAHENDRA PRATAP SINGH UNION OF INDIA
CORAM:
Present:
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral)
1.
certain discrepancies have crept in while drafting of the present petition hence, the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action with better particulars.
2.
10-04-2026 Sapna Goyal NOTE:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-11094
Date of Decision :
MAHENDRA PRATAP SINGH
VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA
Mr. Arun Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate for the respondent-Union of India.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently certain discrepancies have crept in while drafting of the present petition hence, the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of as having been ressed any further with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action with better particulars. Ordered accordingly.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) 2026
(DEEPAK MANCHANDA NOTE: Whether speaking/ reasoned
Whether reportable: NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 094-2026 Date of Decision : 10.04.2026
........Petitioner VERSUS
........Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI DEEPAK MANCHANDA
Vikas Sharma, Advocate
Union of India.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently certain discrepancies have crept in while drafting of the present petition hence, the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of as having been ressed any further with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE
DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE
reasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently certain discrepancies have crept in while drafting of the present petition hence, the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of as having been ressed any further with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of
SAPNA GOYAL 2026.04.18 11:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document