HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 3852 of 2026 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard, Learned counsel for the applicant, the Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.276 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 109(1), 117(2), 103(1), 352, 351(3), 115(2) B.N.S., Police Station- Binauli, District- Baghpat, with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail as the applicant apprehends his arrest in the above-mentioned case. 3. The Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is a minor. The applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case along with his brothers, where it apparently due to an incident, the deceased who remained in the hospital at the time of the death, died due to septicemia as a result of multiple organ failure. A case summary of the Sai Hospital & Critical Care Centre has been filed along with the affidavit, in which it has been mentioned that the patient was discharged on persistent request on 16.09.2025. He further contends that the deceased was then taken to the hospital on 27.10.2025 when his condition worsened and thereafter he died. The Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has not been specified any weapon nor has any specific role been given to the applicant. The number of accused and the weapons assigned to them does not correspond with the injuries received by the injured. He further contends that the injuries that have been found Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Devanshi Singh, Neeraj Tiwari, Saurabh Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Juvenile X .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) on the other injured also do not correspond to the number of accused and the weapons assigned. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. 4. The Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail and has submitted that six people have received injuries in the incident and one person Jogeram has lost his life. He further contends that the applicant has actively participated in the crime in question. The Learned A.G.A., however, could not dispute the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents. 5. I have considered the submissions made by the Learned counsel for the parties and perused the material brought on the record. 6. The applicant and the other accused have been given general role of assault on the injured. Similarly situated co-accused Monu @ Kala, Jitendra @ Jite, Akash, Pappu, Rajeev and Sanjay have been granted regular bail by this Court. The deceased has died on 27.10.2025 as a result of septicemia because of prolonged hospital stay leading to multiple organ failure as per the postmortem report. The applicant is a minor having no criminal antecedents. The charge-sheet has been filed and the applicant is no longer required for custodial interrogation interrogation or arrest. 7. Taking into account all the facts and circumstances of the case as narrated above, I deem it fit to enlarge the applicant on anticipatory bail. 8. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. 9. In the event of the arrest of the applicant Juvenile X, he shall be released forthwith in the aforesaid case crime on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned through his natural guardian Pappu (Father) with the following conditions:- i. the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; ii. that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, NABAIL No. 3852 of 2026 2 threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii. that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; iv. that the applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness; 10. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the Court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. 11. It is made clear that observations made hereinabove are exclusively for deciding the instant anticipatory bail application and are not to be considered to be an opinion on the merits of the case. April 23, 2026 Sachin NABAIL No. 3852 of 2026 3 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad