MANAGING COMMITTEE, MADARSA ISLAMIA MAZHRUL ULOOM v. STATE OF JHARKHAND And ORS
WPC/2548/2009 · 2026-02-04
Deepak Roshan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11019 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11019 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:3158
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No. 2548 of 2009 Managing Committee, Madarsa Islamia Mazhrul Uloom, Pakuria, PO & PS- Pakuria, Madarsa No. 982, District-Pakur, through its Secretary, Md. Islam Ali, son of late Talib Ali, Resident of Village-Moghlabandh, Post Office and Police Station-Pakuria, District-Pakur ... … Petitioner(s)
Versus (1) The State of Jharkhand (2) The Director, Secondary Education Jharkhand, Ranchi (3) The District Education Officer, Pakur, Post Office and Police Station- Pakur, District-Pakur (4) Md. Ibadur Rahman, Ex-Maulvi, son of not known to the petitioner, Resident of Berha, Post Office-Radipur, Police Station-Maheshpur, District-Pakur (5) The Chairman, Jharkhand Academic Council, Jharkhand (6) New Managing Committee Madarsa Islamia Mazharul Uloom, Pakuria, District-Pakur, through District Education Officer, Pakur
... … Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajiv Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent No.4 : Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Advocate
Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate
Mrs. Anjana Das, Advocate For the Respondent No.5 : Mrs. Richa Sanchita, Advocate
Mrs. Malsi Pathak, Advocate
--------
Order No. 31 /Dated: 4th February 2026
The case was heard in the first half however learned counsel for the petitioner was not present and a detailed order was passed. However, learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Rajiv Sinha, appeared in the second half and submits that the instant writ application may be dismissed as withdrawn.
2.
Having regard to the aforesaid submission, the instant writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) 4th February 2026 Amit Uploaded on 06/02/2026