Keshav Kumar @ Keshav Sharma v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./12890/2026 · 2026-03-10
Ashok Kumar Pandey
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11016 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11016 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12890 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2025 Thana- MUSRIGHRARI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Keshav Kumar @ Keshav Sharma S/O Virendra Sharma @ Virendra Kumar Ray @ Nanki Sharma Resident of village- Morba Ray Tol, Police Station Musarigharari, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 10-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 121(1), 121(2), 132, 262, 352, 351(2) of BNS. 3. The case of the prosecution is that the police has gone to execute the non bailable warrant issued against the accused Sonu Sharma who was accused in G.R. Case No. 269/09. It is alleged that when the police reached there, they were informed that the accused was at Bathan and as the police went to the bathan, five persons who were present there started protesting the arrest of the said accused and they became violent and attacked the police with lathi, rod, sword etc. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12890 of 2026(2) dt.10-03-2026 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the name of the petitioner is there in the FIR but the nature of allegation is general and omnibus. The nature of injury sustained by the police is simple. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 15.12.2025. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and has submitted that petitioner is having one criminal antecedent. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Musrigharari P.S. Case No. 200 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur.
Shubham/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T