2026:JHHC:4551 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 40 of 2026 ------ Hansh Kumar @ Putti Yadav @ Hansh Yadav, S/o Ramlakhan Yadav @ Lakhan Yadav, R/o Village- Hurlaong, PO- Sagalim & PS- Panki, District :- Palamau, Jharkhand and presently residing at Mansarovar Colony, PO and PS- Pundag, Distt :- Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ……….. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ……….. For the Petitioner : Mr. Karan Kaushik, Advocate For the State : Mr. Saket Kumar, APP ------ Order No.2 / Dated : 17.02.2026. Heard both the sides. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected on merits and prayer for bail has been renewed on the ground that offence under Section 109 of BNS, 2023 is not made out and further he is in custody for more than 8 months. The petitioner, above-named, who is in custody in connection with S.T. Case No.754 of 2025 [corresponding to G.R. Case No.2573 of 2025 arising out of Nagri (Ranchi) P.S. Case No. 86 of 2025 for the offence registered under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 109, 132 / 3(5) of BNS, 2023 has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail. It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of petitioner that the injury sustained by the injured [Rohit Kumar Ganjhu] was simple in nature and, therefore, offence under Section 109 BNS, 2023 will not be made out. Further, charge has already been framed and the accused/ petitioner has been put on trial. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Under the circumstances, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-(Twenty- Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sandeep/ Uploaded