Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 795 of 2016
1. Jeevan Das Manikpuri S/o Bahuran Das Manikpuri, Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Chichirda, Post Ahilda, P.S. Kasdol, Tahsil And District Baloda Bazar, Chhattisgarh
2. Suresh Kumar Nishad, S/o Sitaram Nishad, Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Chichirda, Post Ahilda, P.S. Kasdol, Tahsil And District Baloda Bazar, Chhattisgarh
3. Hansu Nishad, S/o Sitaram Nishad, Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Chichirda, Post Ahilda, P.S. Kasdol, Tahsil And District Baloda Bazar, Chhattisgarh
4. Jageshwar Chandrakar, S/o Balram Chandrakar, Aged About 28 Years Shish Devari, Post, Tahsil And P.S. Pallari, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Tribal Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, P.S. Rani, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Secretary, Chhattisgarh, State Schedule Tribe Commission, 61- Jal Vihar Colony, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Collector, Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh
4. Superintendent Of Police, Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh
5. Station House Officer, Police Station Kasdol, Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh
6. Mahendra Kumar Paikara, S/o Amarlal Paikara, R/o Post Ahilda Lawan, P.S. Kasdol, District Baloda Bazar, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioners
: Mr. Hemant Gupta, Advocate For State/Respondents No. 1, : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Government Advocate 3 to 5 Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 02.01
.2026
SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.01.02 14:01:05 +0530
2
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that there is no instruction on behalf of the petitioners in this matter.
2. Taking into consideration the submission advanced by Mr. Gupta, it appears that petitioners have lost interest in pursuing the matter. Hence, present writ petition is dismissed on this count alone. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to revive their prayer, if cause of action still survives. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge $iddhant