Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11007 (JHR)

PRIYANSHU SHARMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./725/2024 · 2026-05-05

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:13369] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.725 of 2024 ------ 1. Priyanshu Sharma, Aged about 31 years, S/O- Ghananan Sharma, 2. Ghananan Sharma, Aged about 67 years, S/O- Shubedar Sharma, 3. Alpana Sharma, Aged about 56 years, W/O- Ghananan Sharma, All are R/O- Flat No. 302, Soumya Vihar, Manoram Nagar, L.C. Road, P.O. + P.S.- Dhanbad, Dist- Dhanbad. … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Divya Varma, D/o- Late Shankar Varma, R/o- Tundi Road, Bada Jamua, P.O. + P.S.- Barwadda, Dist- Dhanbad, (Mob. No. 7004897118) … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agrwala, Spl.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mrs. Jasvindar Mazumdar, Advocate Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate ------ Order No:-05 Dated:-05-05-2026 I.A. No. 6113 of 2026 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with the prayer to amend the instant Criminal Miscellaneous Petition by incorporating the additional prayer of quashing the order dated 10.11.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Dhanbad in connection with S.T. Case No. 413 of 2025 arising out of Mahila P.S. Case No. 48 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 2566 of 2023 whereby and where under the charge has been framed against the petitioners; both in para-1 and the prayer portion of the instant Criminal Miscellaneous Petition. It is next submitted that the proposed amendment is necessitated because of the development which took place after filing of the instant Criminal Miscellaneous Petition. It is then submitted that the proposed amendment will not change the nature and character of the instant Criminal Miscellaneous Petition. It is further submitted that unless the amendment as proposed in this interlocutory application is allowed, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the prayer as prayed for in this interlocutory application be allowed. Considering the aforesaid facts, the prayer to carry out the amendment as proposed in this interlocutory application is allowed. The petitioners are directed to file a consolidated Criminal Miscellaneous Petition by incorporating the amendment as proposed in this interlocutory application allowed today. Learned counsel for the petitioners files the consolidated Criminal Miscellaneous Petition in the court today. Keep the same in the record. This interlocutory application is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Cr.M.P. No. 725 of 2024 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners seek permission of this court to withdraw this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition with liberty to raise all the grounds taken in this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition before the appropriate court at the appropriate stage. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 05.05.2026 Saroj/