[2026:RJ-JP:28097] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5295/2024 URN: CRLMP / 10853U / 2024 Vishal Datt S/o Shri Sunil Datt, R/o Lohakhan Shamshan Road, P.s. Civil Line, Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor 2. Hemant Magnani S/o Nanakram Magnani, R/o Nawab Ka Beda, Mali Mohalla, P.s. Clock Tower, Ajmer ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6615/2024 URN: CRLMP / 13414U / 2024 1. Hemant Manganani S/o Shri Nanak Ram Manganani, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 579/21, Mali Mohalla, Nawab Ka Beda Ajmer (Rajasthan) 2. Nanakram Manganani@nanu S/o Late Shri Mool Chand Manganani, Aged About 63 Years, R/o 579/21, Mali Mohalla, Nawab Ka Beda Ajmer (Rajasthan) 3. Dilip Manganani@sankar@saku S/o Late Shri Mool Chand Manganani, Aged About 60 Years, R/o 579/21, Mali Mohalla, Nawab Ka Beda Ajmer (Rajasthan) 4. Ashok Manganani S/o Late Shri Mool Chand Manganani, Aged About 54 Years, R/o 579/21, Mali Mohalla, Nawab Ka Beda Ajmer (Rajasthan) 5. Manish Manganani@monu S/o Shri Rajendra Manganani, Aged About 38 Years, R/o 579/21, Mali Mohalla, Nawab Ka Beda Ajmer (Rajasthan) 6. Dinesh Manganani@sonu S/o Shri Rajendra Manganani, Aged About 40 Years, R/o 579/21, Mali Mohalla, Nawab Ka Beda Ajmer (Rajasthan) 7. Rajesh Manganani S/o Shri Dilip Manganani@sankar@saku, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 579/21, Mali Mohalla, Nawab Ka Beda Ajmer (Rajasthan) ----Petitioners Versus [2026:RJ-JP:28097] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-5295/2024] 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor 2. Vishal Dutt S/o Sunil Dutt, R/o Bhopo Ka Bada, Samshan Road, Ajmer Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devanshu Sharma Mr. Ajay Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 21/07/2026 1. The instant cross-petitions have been submitted with the common prayer to quash the entire proceedings arising out of the two impugned F.I.Rs on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. F.I.R. No.71/2024 was registered at the Police Station Clock Tower, District Ajmer for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 323, 341 & 308 IPC against the accused petitioner- Vishal Datt in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.5295/2024. Whereas, the cross F.I.R No.72/2024 was registered at the same Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 323 & 341 IPC & Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act against the accused-petitioner in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.6615/2024. 2. Learned counsels for the rival sides submit that all the accused-petitioners are neighbours and after registration of the impugned FIRs, they have settled their dispute by entering into a compromise. Learned counsels submit that in order to maintain peace and harmony in their marital life, they do not wish to prosecute each other and want to live a peaceful marital life with [2026:RJ-JP:28097] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-5295/2024] each other. Hence, a prayer has been made for quashing of the proceedings of both the impugned FIRs in their joint interest. 3. Per Contra, Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer. On the last occassion, the Co-ordinate bench of this court directed the parties to appear before the Investigating Officer for verification of compromise. Pursuant to the aforesaid direction issued by the Co- ordinate bench of this Court, the parties have put appearance before the Investigating Officer who has verified the factum of compromise between them and the parties have deposed that they do not want any proceedings against each other and both side have requested to close the cross cases on the basis of compromise between them. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsels for the parties and perusal of the record reveals that the parties are neighbours and after registration of both the impugned FIRs, as they have settled their dispute by entering into a compromise. Now they want to live a peaceful life in harmony. 6. Looking to the fact that none of the parties have sustained grievous injury on any vital part of their body and Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, both the instant petitions stand allowed in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties the impugned FIRs stand quashed and set aside. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J 129-130/AMAN