- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19407 WP No. 10914 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 10914 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. MR G.JAYAPAL (BORROWER) S/O SRI. S.GOVINDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO. 15, 3RD CROSS, NEAR LAKSHMI THEATRE, KRISHNAPPA GARDEN, TAVARAKERE, BTM, BANGALORE -560 029 2. MRS. SHILPA G JAYAPAL (CO-BORROWER) W/O G.JAYAPAL AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO. 15, 3RD CROSS, NEAR LAKSHMI THEATRE, KRISHNAPPA GARDEN, TAVARAKERE, BTM BANGALORE -560 029 ALSO AT SITE NO.30, 2ND CROSS, KRISHNAPPA GARDEN, TAVARAKERE, BTM BANGALORE -560 029 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED ATIF, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.RAJENDRA M.A., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19407 WP No. 10914 of 2025 AND: THE AUTHORISED OFFICER OMKARA ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED REGISTERED OFFICE NO.9, M.P.NAGAR, FIRST STREET, KONGU NAGAR EXTN. TIRUPUR – 641 607 CORPORATE OFFICE C/515, KANAKIA ZILLION, JUNCTION OF LBS ROAD AND CST ROAD, BKC ANNEXE, NEAR EQUINOX, KALINA, KURLA (WEST), MUMBAI – 400 070 ALSO AT KOHINOOR SQUARE, 47TH FLOOR, N.C. KELKAR MARG, R.G. GADKARI CHOWK, DADAR (W), MUMBAI – 400 028 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VIGNESH SHETTY, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH/SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE HONBLE VI ACMM COURT, BENGALURU IN CRL. MISC.NO.4830/2022 ON 05.11.2022 ANNEXURE –A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19407 WP No. 10914 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer: i. To quash/set aside the impugned order passed by the Hon’ble VI ACMM Court, Bengaluru in Crl.Misc.No.4830/2022 on 05.11.2022 Annexure-A. ii. Grant such other relief, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit under the facts and circumstances and on question of law, as stated supra and in the interest of justice. Petitioner has an effective alternative remedy before the DRT and he cannot come before this court. No grounds are urged seeking interference of this court. In that view of the matter, this court is passing the following: ORDER i. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy before the DRT. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19407 WP No. 10914 of 2025 ii. The petitioner shall avail the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. iii. Pending I.As., in the petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43