1 ( 2026:HHC:21027 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.392 of 2026 Date of Decision: 02.06.2026 ___________________________________________________ Rajnish Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar and another …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Nalneesh Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate has placed on record communication dated 01.06.2026, alongwith copy of office order of even date, wherein it has been stated that in compliance to the direction passed by this Court in CWP No.12311 of 2024, the case of the petitioner was considered and rejected, vide office order dated 01.06.2026. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:21027 ) 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and, accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged 3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to assail the consideration order in accordance with law, if he is still aggrieved. The petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) June 02, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)