- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14356 RP No. 102 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR REVIEW PETITION NO. 102 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. MS. LEIA CARIAPPA D/O. RAJESH CARIAPPA AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS NO.21, 'B' TYPE 2ND FLOOR SHEFALI APARTMENTS NO.26 AGA ABBAS ALI ROAD BENGALURU - 560 008 (SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY HER NEXT FRIEND / MOTHER SMT. SHRUTHI CAUVERY IYER W/O. GOVIND SHIVKUMAR AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS NO.21, 'B' BYPE 2ND FLOOR SHEFALI APARTMENTS NO.26 AGA ABBAS ALI ROAD BENGALURU - 560 008. …PETITIONER (BY SRI VIJAY A.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS BENGALURU NORTH KEMPEGOWDA ROAD OPPOSITE CAUVERY BHAVAN BENGALURU - 560 002. Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14356 RP No. 102 of 2023 3. THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER BENGALURU NORTH-4 YELAHANKA BENGALURU - 560 064. 4. THE PRINCIPAL VIDYASHILP ACADEMY SY.NO.1 AND 13 GOVINDAPURA BEHIND YELAHANKA AIRFORCE BASE BENGALURU - 560 064. 5. THE PRINCIPAL BANGALORE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL GEDDALAHALLI HENNUR - BAGALUR ROAD KOTHANUR POST BENGALURU - 560 077. 6. SRI RAJESH CARIAPPA S/O. PEMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS NO.7/1, ZEN HOUSE LANGRORD ROAD RICHMOND TOWN BENGALURU - 560 025. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B.S.GURUSWAMY, LEARNED AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI CHANDAN K. ADVOCATE FOR R4; VIDE ORDER DATED 10.03.2026 NOTICE TO R5 IS DISPENSED; VIDE ORDER DATED 02.09.2025 NOTICE TO R6 IS HELD SUFFICIENT;) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF CPC PRAYING TO REVIEW THE FINAL ORDER DATED 13.01.2023 PASSED IN W.P.NO.19234/2022, THEREBY EXPUNGING THE OBSERVATION MADE IN SENTENCE COMMENCING FROM 14TH LINE OF PARA-6 COMMENCING WITH THE WORDS "BUT THE FACT REMAINS.." - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14356 RP No. 102 of 2023 UNTIL THE END OF THE SENTENCE ENDING WITH THE WORDS ".. WHICH IS PENDING ADJUDICATION". THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and learned counsel for respondent No.4. 2. This petition is filed seeking review of the order dated 13.01.2023 passed in W.P.No.19234/2022, thereby expunging the observation made in sentence commencing from 14th line of para-6 commencing with the words "But the fact remains.." until the end of the sentence ending with the words ".. which is pending adjudication". 3. It is the submission of the learned counsel for petitioner that there is a slight error apparent on the face of the order in the para-6, inasmuch as the violation and breach of the terms and conditions of the settlement are - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14356 RP No. 102 of 2023 by respondent No.6, against whom a contempt petition has been initiated by the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner also submits that the contempt petition was dropped upon accepting the apology of respondent No.6, who is none other than the father of the minor child. Therefore, the submission of the learned counsel is found to be sustainable and the same is accepted. Accordingly, line 14 of para-6 requires to be modified as it is an error apparent on the record/order. "But the fact remains that respondent no. 6 violated and breached the terms and conditions of the said Memorandum of Settlement as agreed between them, which resulted in filing of a contempt petition before the Contempt Court, which is pending adjudication." Accordingly, this petition is disposed off. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1