Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10995 (BOM)

AMOL DIGHAMBAR SONAVANE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

BA/3620/2025 · 2026-09-23

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

64.BA.3620.2025.doc Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3620 OF 2025 Amol Dighambar Sonavane .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents ....................  Mr. Raj Bannatwala a/w. Mr. Pritam Bhutada, Advocates for Applicant.  Ms. Rajeshree V. Newton, APP for Respondent No.1 – State.  Ms. Rekha Musale, Advocate for Respondent No.2.  GPSI – S.R. Bhise, Saswad Police Station, Pune Rural present. ......…........... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 23, 2026. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Bannatwala, learned Advocate for Applicant; Ms. Newton, learned APP for Respondent No.1 – State and Ms. Musale, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2. 2. After expressing my disinclination to Mr. Bannatwala for allowing the present Bail Application, in his usual fair mindedness he would submit that Applicant be allowed to withdraw the Bail Application with leave and liberty to the Applicant to approach this Court later in accordance with law. 3. Reserving such leave and liberty to Applicant as available to him in law, Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn. 1 of 2 64.BA.3620.2025.doc 4. Bail Application is dismissed. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay 2 of 2 AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Digitally signed by AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2026.09.23 16:07:07 +0530