APHC010332712016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] THURSDAY, THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 2161/2016 Between: 1. K. PRABHAKAR REDDY,, S/O. CHINNA RAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC: ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRIKALAHASTI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, LEGISLATURE AFFAIRS & JUSTICE A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS SECRETARIAT. HYDERABAD 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTIONS, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, LAKADIKAPOOL, HYDERABAD. 3. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTIONS FAC, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, LAKADIKAPOOL, HYDERABAD 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR. CHITTOOR DISTRICT 5. K SURYANADHA REDDY, VI ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE (FT) TIRUPATI ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ. more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the radio message No. 527/A2/2015 dated 21- 01-2016 issued by the Additional Director of Prosecutions (FAC) the 3rd respondent herein in so far as placing the 5W respondent as incharge Additional Public Prosecutor for the Court of Assistant Sessions Judge, 2 Srikalahasti, Chittoor District in the place of the petitioner before expiring his term as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and set aside the same IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 2742 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to continue the petitioner as Additional Public Prosecutor for the Court of Assistant Sessions Judge, Srikalahasti, Chittoor District by suspending radio message No. 527/A2/2015 dated 21-01- 2016 by 3rd respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V SUDHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LAW & LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 2161 of 2016 ORDER: Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that no further cause survives in this writ petition and thus, the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 17.09.2026 KA/JS 4 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 2161 of 2016 Date: 17.09.2026 KA/JS