RUKHMINI VITHOBA SAWANT v. VIMAL MAHADU BELOSEY AND ANR.
IA/3585/2023 · 2026-09-22
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10992 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10992 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
43-ia3585-2023 & connected.doc AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3585 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 17859 OF 2022 WITH FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.17859 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.5818 OF 2026 Rukhmini Vithoba Sawant … Appellant V/s. Vimal Mahadu Belosey & Anr. … Respondents Mr. Saurabh Godbole i/by Mr. Sahil Mahajan for the appellant/applicant. Ms. Deepa S. Punde i/by Mr. Sachin S. Punde for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 22, 2026 P.C.:
1. It appears that the applicant’s claim made before the Reference Court has not been adjudicated on merits. It is, therefore, open for the applicant to take out appropriate proceedings as are permissible in law to establish her rights over the compensation amount.
2. Interim Application No.3585 of 2023 filed seeking leave to file appeal against the Award passed in favour of the respondent (widow) need not be entertained. Hence, the same stands rejected. 1 ATUL GANESH KULKARNI Digitally signed by ATUL GANESH KULKARNI Date: 2026.09.22 17:23:39 +0530
43-ia3585-2023 & connected.doc
3. However, the applicant is at liberty to take out appropriate proceedings for establishing her right.
4. The interim application stands disposed off.
5. Consequently, the first appeal does not survive and the same stands disposed off.
6. In view of this, all pending interlocutory applications stands
disposed off as infructuous.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.) 2