120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.15099 of 2026 Date of decision: 10.04.2026 Suraj Sharma and others …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present :- None for the petitioners. Mr. Sushil Kumar Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana. None for respondent No.2. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) 1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners as well as respondent No.2. 2. On the last date of hearing, none was present on behalf of the petitioners. 3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) 10.04.2026 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No NEETU RANI 2026.04.10 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD