[2026:RJ-JP:28744] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11517/2026 CNR: RJHC020692222026 | URN: CRLMB / 21257U / 2026 Vikram Singh @ Tiger S/o Surjaram, Age 24 Years, R/o Amarpura, Nayagaon, Police Station Paniyala, District Kotputli Behror ( At Present Confined In District Jail Kotputli) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 24/07/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order of the learned trial Court dated 30.03.2026 on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 55/2026 registered at Police Station Paniyala, District Kotputli-Behror for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 3, 25 and 9 of Arms Act, wherein charge-sheet has been submitted for offence(s) under Sections 3 and 25 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long. He further submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, [2026:RJ-JP:28744] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11517/2026] therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove and submits that six other criminal antecedents are registered against the accused-petitioner, therefore, he may not be granted benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 20.03.2026; that recovery has already been effected; that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Vikram Singh @ Tiger S/o Surjaram is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his [2026:RJ-JP:28744] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11517/2026] presence on 25th of every month in the concerned police station till the conclusion of trial. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court, Jail authorities and SHO through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 86/HEENA