Page No.# 1/4 GAHC030005272026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/147/2026 Village Council of Sihphir R/b its President namely Sh. R. Lalremruata, C/o Sihphir, Aizawl, Mizoram - 796014 VERSUS The State of Mizoram and 7 Ors. R/b The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Mizoram, Aizawl 2:The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram 3:The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram 4:The Director 5:The Director 6:The Competent Authority for Land Acquisition 7:The National Highways and Infrastructure Corporation Ltd. (NHIDCL) 8:Sairang Dinthar Village Counci Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Dinari T Azyu Advocate for the Respondent : Page No.# 2/4 Linked Case : WP(C)/65/2026 Village Coucil of Sihphir R/b its President Sh. R. Lalremruata S/o RL Rohlira (L) R/o Sihphir Aizawl District VERSUS The State of Mizoram and 7 Ors. R/b the Chief Secretary Govt. of Mizoram Aizawl 2:The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Land Revenue and Settlement Department aizawl 3:The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Local Administration Department Aizawl 4:The Director Local Administration Department Govt. of Mizoram Aizawl 5:The Director Land Revenue and Settlement Department Govt. of Mizoram Aizawl 6:The Competent Authority for Land Acquisition NH-06 Aizawl District Aizawl 7:The National Highways and Infrastruction Corporation Ltd. (NHIDCL) r/b the Executive Director (P) Regional Office Tuikhuahtlang Aiawl - 796001 Page No.# 3/4 Advocate for the Petitioner : Mrs. Dinari T. Azyu Sr. Adv. Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA Mizoram for R 1-5 BEFORE HONORABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER 24.07.2026 Heard Mr. Victor L. Ralte, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mrs. Vanneihsiami, learned Govt. Advocate for the State and Mr. Kartik Jain, learned counsel for the respondent No. 7. By this Interlocutory Application, the applicant has raised the issue that after the interim order was passed in the present case, the respondents have acted in violation thereof. He submits that an interim order was passed in the main writ petition i.e., WP(C) No. 65/2026, wherein it was directed that no disbursement of compensation should be done to the land owners, for acquisition of their land for construction of the road, without taking liberty of this Court and the said order was passed on 03.07.2026. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits and has placed a notification dated 17.07.2026 issued by the competent authority for land acquisition (NH-06) i.e., Cala and Additional Deputy Commissioner, Aizawl District, Mizoram, requesting 19 land owners mentioned therein, to bring their xerox copy of Aadhar Card, Page No.# 4/4 Voters ID, Pan Card, Bank Passbook and original land passes for the purpose of getting the compensation with regard to their land being acquired for construction of the road. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the documents have been asked from the said land owners and at any point of time, the compensation can be disbursed to them before the settlement of dispute between the petitioner and respondent No. 8 which is pending before the Inter- Village Boundary Dispute Committee. However, it is seen that in the said interim order passed in the instant case that disbursement is directed to be paid, only after taking leave of this Court. However, the public notice that has been placed by the learned counsel for the petitioner has not mentioned about disbursement of money to the said land owners. As such, there is no violation of the interim order, as such. Be that as it may. However, it is further reiterated that no disbursement of compensation amount should be done to the land owners, without taking leave of this Court pursuant to the notice dated 17.07.2026 mentioned above. I.A. is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant