Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10985 (CAL)

DIPIKA MONDAL @ DIPIKA MANDAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/4317/2025 · 2026-01-27

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AD 18 January 27, 2026 Ct. 28 SG CRM(A) 4317 of 2025 Allowed An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Manikchak P.S. Case No.515 of 2025 dated 02.07.2025 under Sections 109/117(2)/329(4)/351(3) the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of: Dipika Mondal @ Dipika Mandal … petitioner Mr. Tapodip Gupta Mr. Suman Bhanja Mr. Golam Ahammed … for the petitioner Mr. Soumik Ganguly Mr. Saptarshi Chakraborty ... for the State Heard learned counsels for the parties. Perused the case diary. It appears that the allegation of assault is levelled against the widowed daughter-in-law of the de facto complainant. The injury report shows that the injury is slight, although on the scalp. Considering the above, the other materials available in the case diary and the fact that a charge-sheet has been submitted and the petitioner is a lady, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting 2 Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and on the further conditions that the petitioner shall surrender before the jurisdictional court within four weeks from this date and pray for bail and shall not threaten or intimidate witnesses. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)