PRANESH KUMAR PRAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THRO THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND LAND REFORMS
WPC/7586/2025 · 2026-01-19
Rajesh Kumar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10984 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10984 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:1311 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No.7586 of 2025
1. Pranesh Kumar Pran, aged about 59 years, son of Late Lalit Kumar Ray.
2. Ramesh Chandra Ray, aged about 72 years, son of Late Yamuna Prasad Ray. Both are resident of Village & P.O. Ghorlas, P.S. Jasidih, District Deoghar, Jharkhand …… Petitioners Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, having its office at HEC, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District Ranchi.
2. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, P.O. and P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar, Jharkhand.
3. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Deoghar, P.O. and P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar, Jharkhand.
4. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Medium Irrigation Project, Deoghar, P.O. and P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. …... Respondents ---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. A. K. Choudhary, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mr. Ankit Kumar, AC to SC-I ---------
02/Dated: 19
th January, 2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief :-
“(a) issuance of appropriate writ (s), order(s), direction(s) commanding upon the respondents to pay the compensation of the land acquired in L.A. Case No. 04 of 2001-02 with regard to J.B. No. 14, Plot Nos. 294 (area 1.97 acres) and 295 (area 2.40 acres) as well as with regard to J.B. No. 13, Plot No. 36, Area 5.10 acres of village Chhota Manikpur, No. 116 within P.S. Jasidih, District Deoghar as per the provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 to the petitioners and other co-sharers.” - 1 - W.P.(C) No.7586 of 2025
2026:JHHC:1311
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.
3.
Learned counsel for the State has raised no objection.
4. Permission is accorded.
5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is, hereby, dismissed as withdrawn.
6. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands
disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 19th January, 2026 Ravi-Chandan/- Uploaded on 20.01.2026 - 2 - W.P.(C) No.7586 of 2025