[2026:RJ-JP:29153] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8664/2026 CNR: RJHC020535912026 | URN: CRLMB / 15840U / 2026 Sohel @ Suhail S/o Nanua, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ghoghor, Police Station Kaithwara District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ---Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9591/2026 CNR: RJHC020581272026 | URN: CRLMB / 17799U / 2026 Arbaj S/o Sabu, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Rayabka, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present In Sub Jail Kaman, Deeg). ---Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11199/2026 CNR: RJHC020634452026 | URN: CRLMB / 20711U / 2026 Aasif S/o Aamin, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Rayabaka, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Deeg). ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh with Mr. Anoop Kumar Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan Mr. Hemendra Goyal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA [2026:RJ-JP:29153] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-8664/2026] Judgment / Order 28/07/2026 1. The present bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the orders dated 26.05.2026 & 08.06.2026, respectively passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge Kama, District-Deeg, in Criminal Misc. Case (CIS) No.727/2026, 726/2026 & 810/2026, respectively, whereby the bail application of the petitioners were rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.66/2026, Police Station-Kaithwara, District-Deeg for the offences under Section 318(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023 & Section 66-C and 66-D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners namely Sohel @ Suhail & Arbaj are in custody since 09.05.2026 and petitioner namely Aasif is in custody since 13.05.2026. He further submits that the challan in the case has already been filed, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time, offences are triable by Magistrate. He further submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature in past, and, therefore, he prays that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the present bail applications. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. [2026:RJ-JP:29153] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-8664/2026] 5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the fact that the petitioners are in custody since 09.05.2026 & 13.05.2026, respectively; offences are triable by Magistrate; the challan has been filed; trial will take considerable time, there is no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature in past, this Court is of the opinion that the bail applications filed by the petitioners deserve to be accepted. 6. Consequently, the bail applications are allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely-(i) Sohel @ Suhail S/o Nanua (ii)Arbaj S/o Sabu (iii) Aasif S/o Aamin arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.66/2026, Police Station-Kaithwara, District-Deeg, shall be released on bail; provided each of them furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioners shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioners shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected, of the commission of which they are suspected; (iii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. [2026:RJ-JP:29153] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-8664/2026] (iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/37, 39, 40