APHC010828092014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 21st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13469 OF 2014 Between: 1. CHINTAPALLI SRI RAM, KRISHNA DIST., S/o. Subba Rao, Age 33 years, Occ : Business, R/o. H.No.1/11, Peddapalaparru, Via Moturu, Mudinepalli Mandal, Krishna District. rep. by his GPA holder, Chintapalli Subba Rao ...Petitioner AND 1. C M D AP SPDCL 3 ORS, (APSPDCL), Tirupathi, Chittoor District, rep. by its Chairman 86 Managing Director 2. The Divisional Electrical Engineer A P S P D C L, Gudivada, Krishna District. 3. The Assistant Engineer Gudivada D1 A P S P D C L, Gudivada, Krishna District. 4. Gudivada Municipality, rep. by its Commissioner, Gudivada, Krishna District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in not providing 2 Service Connection to the First Floor of the petitioner's building bearing D.No.15/191, S.N.Puram, Gudivada, Krishna District, by relying on the letter addressed by the 4th respondent in Roc. No. 206/G2/2010, dated 04.03.2013 even though such letters are not binding on the respondents 1 to 3, as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to provide the electricity service connection to the aforesaid First Floor of the petitioner building IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 16835 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to provide the electricity service connection to the First Floor of petitioner building bearing D.No.15/191, S.N.Puram, Gudivada, Krishna District, forthwith without reference to the letter of the 4th respondent in Roc.No.206/G2/2010, dt. 04-03-2013, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition IA NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP 19668 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to amedn the writ affidavit prayer in the WP.No.13469 of 2014 as well as WP.MP.No.16835 of 2014 as " Ground Floor" instead of 'First Floor' and pass. IA NO: 3 OF 2014(WPMP 27182 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to implead as proposed Respondent No.5 in the WP No. 13469 of 2014 as well as WPMP IA NO: 4 OF 2014(WPMP 42423 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 3 post the WPMP No.16835 of 2014 in W.P.No. 13469 of 2014 under the caption "For Being Mentioned' to clarify with regard to issuance of amended order in WPMP No.19668 of 2014 IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 84619 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP 110653 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: K RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: D KANAKA SUNDAR Counsel for the Respondents:Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni,Standing Counsel For Municipalities Counsel for the Respondents:V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) Counsel for the Respondents:D SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents:JAGARLAMUDIKOTESWARIDEVI(SC FORAPSPDCL) Counsel for the Respondents:VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA The Court made the following order: 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13469 OF 2014 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. Recording the said submission, Writ Petition is closed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 21.09.2026 TTPPSS//G GNNPP 5 49 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13469 OF 2014 21.09.2026 TTPPSS//G GNNPP