Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10977 (CHH)

CHAITURAM v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1258/2026 · 2026-02-02

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:5923 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1258 of 2026 1 - Chaituram S/o Sudhan Ram, Aged About 50 Years Working As Peon Govt. Middle School, Sahidand Block Bagicha, District- Jashpur (C.G.) 2 - Sithu Ram S/o Tanglu Ram Aged About 52 Years Working As Peon, Govt. Primary School Rengle, Block Bagicha, District- Jashpur (C.G.) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe Development Department, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh, School Education Department, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, District- Jashpur (C.G.) 4 - The Collector Jashpur, District- Jashpur (C.G.) 5 - The District Education Officer Jashpur, District- Jashpur (C.G.) 6 - The Block Education Officer Bagicha, District- Jashpur (C.G.) --- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS system) For Petitioners : Mr. Harish Khuntiya, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, P.L. 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 03/02/2026 1. Petitioners have filed this petition seeking following relief (s):- “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioners from the respondents. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to grant second time bound pay scale in favour of petitioners with effect from the date of completion of 20 years services, with arrears, in accordance with law. 10.3 That any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case, including cost of the petition may kindly be awarded to the petitioners” 2. Learned counsel for petitionerd submits that petitioners at present are working as Peon. They have completed more than 20 years of service on the said post. After completion of 10 years of service, petitioners were granted first time pay scale, however, the benefit of second time pay scale is not extended to petitioners even after forwarding proposal by the Block Education Officer to District Education Officer in this regard. He submits that similarly situated employees have been extended benefit of second time pay scale, therefore, action of respondent No.5 is arbitrary and discriminatory. 3. Learned State counsel submits that petitioners have not submitted any representation before the respondents authorities and if petitioners 3 submit such representation, it will be considered and decided in accordance with law. 4. On due consideration on the submission of learned counsel for respective parties, nature of grievance raised, without entering into merits of the case this writ petition at this stage is disposed of permitting petitioners to submit detailed representation before respondents No.5. If such representation is submitted, concerned authorities shall consider and take decision on the representation to be submitted by petitioners, in accordance with law in, an objective manner within further period of four weeks from the date of receipt of representation. 5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram