Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10974 (GAU)

ANIL BHARALI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

Crl.A./114/2026 · 2026-07-22

Michael Zothankhuma, Rajesh Mazumdar

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010060362026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.A./114/2026 ANIL BHARALI SON OF LATE PADMANATH BHARALI, RESIDENT OF VILL- DAHATI, P.S. BARPETA, DISTRICT BARPETA, ASSAM - 781314. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM. 2:MRIGANKAR DAS SON OF GAUTAM DAS RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MATUAKUCHI UNDER BARPETA POLICE STATION IN THE DISTRICT OF BARPETA ASSAM -78131 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A ATREYA, MS. C KALITA,MR D K BHATTACHARYYA,MS. C KALITA,MR. J KONWAR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 23/07/2026 (Michael Zothankhuma, J) Page No.# 2/2 1. Mr. A. Atreya, learned counsel for the appellant submits that there was some misunderstanding in filing of 2 appeals by the appellant, against the same impugned judgement, by which he was convicted under Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He submits that due to a misunderstanding, 2 (two) appeals i.e. Criminal Appeal No. 114/2026 and Criminal Appeal No. 121/2026, have been filed against the same impugned judgement by the appellant. He accordingly prays that the appellant may be allowed to withdraw Criminal Appeal No. 114/2026. 2. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned APP, Assam, submits that he has got no objection to the same. 3. Accordingly, Criminal Appeal No. 114/2026 is dismissed as withdrawn. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant