APHC010340102025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1856/2025 Between: 1. GAYATHRI CONSTRUCTIONS, MIG 2-45, NEAR SAI PUBLIC SCHOOL, APH COLONY, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SMT KUMUDAWATHI SEETHA ...PETITIONER AND 1. G SAI PRASAD, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI G SAI PRASAD, COMMISSIONER, CADA AND SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, WATER RESOURCES (CADA) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SRI R MOHAN RAO, SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. SRI B ANJANEYA PRASAD, (PRESENT) EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KRISHNA EASTERN DIVISION VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. SRI SARIPALLI SRINU, DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION AND C.A.D. DEPARTMENT, COWTHARAM SUB- 2 DIVISION, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience to the order dated 22-04-2025 passed in W.P. No. 3540 of 2025 under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Court Act r/w Article 215 of the Constitution of India, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. T S RAYALU 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the orders dated 22.04.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.3540 of 2025. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondents have complied with the orders passed by this Court and no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt case is closed, accordingly. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 18.09.2026 rsd 4 196 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1856/2025 Date: 18.09.2026 rsd