HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 8597 of 2025 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri Swetashwa Agarwal, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Neelesh Ramchandani, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Pankaj Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The applicant-Anand Kumar Singh was granted interim anticipatory bail in the present case by this Court vide order dated 03.11.2025. The said order is quoted herein below: "1. Heard Sri Shwetashwa Agarwal along with Sri Neelesh Ramchandani, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri P.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the first informant and Sri U.S. Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime no. 0180 of 2024 under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 4171, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Civil Lines, District Etawah with the prayer that in the event of arrest, the applicant may be released on bail. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that FIR has been lodged after delay of four years. It is also submitted that an FIR was lodged against the first informant in the State of Tripura in the year 2022 against which, he approached the High Court Tripura for cancellation of the same but he moved to Hon'ble Supreme Court and the same was Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neelesh Ramchandani, Swetashwa Agarwal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Pankaj Kumar Mishra Anand Kumar Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) rejected and the FIR was registered the first informant. It is further submitted that the present prosecution has been lodged as a counter blast to the said case. It was also submitted that applicant undertakes to co- operate during trial and he would appear as and when required by the investigating agency or Court and in case he is granted anticipatory bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and would obey all conditions of bail. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the first informant as well as learned AGAS pray for some time to file counter affidavit. 5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and all attending facts and circumstances of the case, let the applicant Anand Kumar Singh in the event of his arrest, be released on interim anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned till 02nd December, 2025 with the following conditions :- (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence and that he would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicant would co-operate during trial and would not misuse the liberty of bail. (iv) The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court concerned. 7. In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of the interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant. 8. Put up this case as fresh on 02.12.2025. 9. In the meantime, opposite parties may file counter affidavit. " NABAIL No. 8597 of 2025 2 3. Earlier interim anticipatory bail was granted to the applicant vide order dated 03.11.2025 and in pursuance of aforesaid order, the applicant is regularly appearing before the learned trial court which is clear from perusal of order sheet appended in the supplementary affidavit dated 31.08.2026. 4. In view of above, the interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant vide order dated 03.11.2025 is hereby made absolute. The applicant Anand Kumar Singh, will remain on anticipatory bail till conclusion of trial on the same terms and conditions as given in the order dated 03.11.2025 passed by this Court. 5. The anticipatory bail application stands allowed. 6. In default or misuse of any of the conditions mentioned in the order dated 03.11.2025, the Public Prosecutor/ Investigating Officer/ first informant-complainant would be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant, before the concerned court. October 1, 2026 Nitendra NABAIL No. 8597 of 2025 3 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITENDRA TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad