2026:JHHC:3167 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt (Civil) Case No. 313 of 2025 ------ 1. Prof. Mohammad Mustajab Ali Khan, aged about 80 years, son of Late Md. Sarfaraz Hussain Khan, resident of Balun Noor, Road No.19, Professors Colony, Jawaharnagar, Near JKS College, P.O. and P.S. Mango, Jamshedpur, Azadnagar, District Singhbhum East. 2. Syed Khursheed Ahsan, aged about 79 years, son of Late Syed Nazir Ahsan, resident of House No.10, C.R. Road No.1 Road No.12, Jawahar Nagar, P.O. and P.S. Mango, Jamshedpur, District Singhbhum East. 3. S. M. Amiruddin, aged about 80 years, son of Late Sheikh Md. Ibrahim, resident of House No.07, Road No.13A, Jawahar Nagar, P.O. and P.S. Mango, Jamshepur, District Singhbhum East. 4. Smt. Aisha Siddique, aged about 78 years, wife of Late Md. Shamim Ahmad, resident of 18, JKS Colony, Pardih, P.O. and P.S. Azad Nagar, Jamshedpur, District Singhbhum East. 5. Manzar Hasnain, aged about 74 years, son of Late Prof. Manzar Shahab, resident of Ex-5/3 Vatika, Green Valley, Pardih Road, Azad Nagar, Jamshedpur, Р.О. and P.S. Mango, District- East Singhbhum. … Petitioner(s) Versus 6. The State of Jharkhand 7. Shri Ramniwas Yadav, the Director, Department of Higher, Technical Education and Skill Development, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 8. Prof. Ajit Kumar Sinha, the Vice-Chancellor, Ranchi University, Ranchi, P.O. GPO-1, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi. 9. Dr. Md. Reyaz, the Principal, Karim City College, Jamshedpur, Sakchi, P.O. and P.S. Mango, District- Singhbhum East. ...Opp. Party(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the petitioner(s): Mr. A. Allam, Sr. Advocate. M/s Faisal Allam, Sushmita Kumari, and Asfia Sultana, Advocates. For the State Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate. For the University: M/s A.K. Mehta, Amit Kr. Sinha and Shubham Malviya, Advocates. ------ 13/06.02.2026: It has been submitted by the parties that the order dated 20.6.2024 passed in WP(S) No. 4010 of 2022 has been complied with. Considering the aforesaid submission, I am of the opinion that no contempt is made out. Accordingly, this contempt is dropped. Pending interlocutory application, if any, also stands disposed of. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file an appropriate application challenging the order passed by the opposite parties. 06th February, 2026 (ANANDA SEN, J.) Anu/-Cp2. Uploaded on: 07.02.2026