IMTEYAZ ANSARI ALIAS IMTIYAZ ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3120/2026 · 2026-05-04
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10972 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10972 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:13130 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 3120 of 2026
Imteyaz Ansari @ Imtiyaz Ansari, aged about 32 years, Son of Samsher Alam.
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opposite Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rishu Ranjan, Advocate
For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Satish Prasad, Advocate
For the Informant : Mr. Wazid Ali, Advocate
: Mr. Sheyakur Rahman, Advocate
---
04/04.05.2026
1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 14.02.2026 in connection with Pithoria P.S Case No. 20 of 2025, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 109 & 74 of the B.N.S pending in the court of learned SDJM, Ranchi.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and they have settled their dispute outside the court and the victim did not suffer any injury.
4.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has submitted that there is no injury on the victim. He has further submitted that this submission is made on the basis of material collected during investigation in the case diary.
5.
Learned counsel for the informant has also submitted that the informant had no grievance, the parties have settled their dispute and he has no objection, if the petitioner is enlarged on bail.
6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each
2026:JHHC:13130 2
to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Ranchi in connection with Pithoria P.S. Case No. 20 of 2025 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.
7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
8. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 04.05.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-04.05.2026